The required four year Delivery Program lists specific programs and projects, or principal activities, that are local council's responsibility, and financial estimates over a four year horizon (corresponding with local council electoral cycles). The Delivery Program is to be prepared in response to the aspirations and priorities established by the Community Strategic Plan and is the key accountability mechanism for local councils - a 'central reference point for decision making and performance monitoring' (IP&R Manual, 2013).
The annual Operational Plan is a detailed sub-set of the Delivery Program, adopted before the beginning of each financial year, and listing the individual actions (projects and activities) that will be undertaken (plus Council's Revenue Policy).
a) Generating specific four and one year actions from broad Community Strategic Plan strategies
In accordance with the logic of the IP&R framework, the broad strategies in the Community Strategic Plan can be used to generate a list of key activities and actions for possible inclusion in their Delivery Program and Operational Plan (as shown in the tables below) and through the reality check of the Resourcing Strategy.
Active living objective: A physically active community
| Broad strategies | Possible activities/ actions |
|---|---|
|
Provide quality open space, sporting and recreation facilities accessible for all ages, ethnicities, ability-levels and socio-economic groups |
|
|
Ensure a range of physical activities is available for all ages, ethnicities, ability-levels and socio-economic groups |
|
|
Ensure active travel options (such as walking, cycling and public transport) are readily available, between home, centres and attractions. |
|
|
Ensure that localities are walkable |
|
|
Provide streets are attractive and safe |
|
|
Provide town centres and other key destinations that are safe, vibrant and attractive, day and night |
|
|
Require private developments to address the street and be well connected to movement systems |
|
|
Undertake education activities to promote active living |
|
Healthy eating objective: Implement measures that support and promote healthy eating
| Broad strategies | Possible activities/ actions |
|---|---|
|
Undertake education activities and provide information to promote healthy food options |
|
|
Promote sustainable food practices |
|
|
Increase community access to healthy food options |
|
|
Maintain and extend participation in local and regional food production and exchange |
|
|
Protect and utilise land appropriate for local and regional food production; a robust approach, promoting future innovation. |
|
|
Provide local technical input into the preparation and implementation of District Plans and Regional Growth Plans on the location and nature of food related land uses. |
|
|
Promote private investment and innovation in healthy food |
|
|
Ensure food preparation and handling are clean and safe |
|
|
Minimise food waste to landfill and link initiatives with healthy eating practices |
|
b) The role of existing and future strategy documents
The IP&R Manual (2013) acknowledges the possible role of free-standing ‘other strategic plans’ in elaborating on the broad strategies listed in the Community Strategic Plan – a way to break down broad matters covered in the vision and assist in prioritising matters for coverage at the implementation stage (via the specific Delivery Program and Operational Plan). In many circumstances these strategies/plans already exist, and in some case study councils they are being reviewed, refined and consolidated.
Some of the plans and policies cited in the case study councils are directly relevant to active living and healthy eating. These include:
- Health Plan
- Food Plan
- Structure Plans
- Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP)
- Bike Plan
- Disability action plans and access policy
- Social Plan
- CBD Strategy/ Masterplan
- Environmental Management Strategy
- Plans of Management for Community Land
- Section 94 contribution plan(s)
- Multicultural/ diversity plan
The role of Structure Plans
Of particular relevance would be any Structure Plan. Whilst not mandatory, Structure Plans may be prepared to inform the content of a Standard Local Environmental Plan (LEP). Such structure plans, while not having the legal status of the subsequent LEP, would be well placed within the Community Strategic Plan as a guide to longer-term spatial connections. For instance, they can identify structural connections (perhaps as future land reservations) beyond the time-frame of the statutory LEP. Including such initiatives in plan-form can prompt action when the time is right (eg. as a result of movement in the property market or where significant applications fit, or will disrupt, such future intentions).
If community health and well-being is seen to be a community priority, then Council could prepare a “Community Health and Well-being Strategy”, and include coverage of active living and healthy eating.
Penrith Council’s consolidated Strategies
Penrith City Council has identified and reviewed all of their substantive ‘’strategy’’ documents. The "City Strategy’’ is a consolidated listing and overview. As an ongoing endeavour, this provides a ready means of monitoring and updating existing and future strategies. Council is working on common terminology and format.
This document represents the “non-corporate” strategies, as distinct from “corporate strategies” such as the Resourcing Strategy. In combination with the required Resourcing Strategy it feeds the Delivery Program and Operational Plan.
In principle, such strategy documents would align with the council's various service activities, in circumstances where elaboration and a program are required. Some councils list their various services in their Community Strategic Plan.
c) Options for moving from the Community Strategic Plan to the Delivery Program and Operational Plan
Four options are available to local councils to elaborate on the Community Strategic Plan provisions:
- As activities detailed in a broad Community Health and Wellbeing Strategy, the progress of which would be listed in the Delivery Program, with specific priority actions in the Operational Plan. Such a strategy could address other matters such as social connectivity.
- As free-standing Active Living and Healthy Food Strategies, the progress of which would be listed in the Delivery Program with specific actions in the Operational Plan.
- As specific activities and actions in the Delivery Program and Operational Plan.
- A combination of the above options eg. progress of the Strategy (broad or free-standing) as a Delivery Program “activity” plus specific Delivery Program and Operational Plan actions.
Kiama Council’s Health Plan and The Penrith Food Project
Kiama Council have had a Health Plan for long over a decade. It covers active living and healthy eating and feeds the Council’s Delivery Program and Operational Plan. Kiama Council staff also emphasised the significance of leadership and staffing. An active Mayor promoted the Plan and a dedicated staff member has ongoing responsibility. In Victoria, councils are required to have a Municipal Health Plan. In NSW, the approach is more flexible.
Penrith Council has a food specific strategy (The Penrith Food Project) with detailed goals and objectives.
Some suggest that having a generalised, non-specific Delivery Program (reliant on detailed strategies) provides flexibility, enabling reaction to windfalls (such as grant funding success) and shifts in priority (from Councillors or staff).
In the absence of a Strategy document, local councils could pursue specific "activities" and "actions" in their Delivery Program and Operational Plan. Sample "action tables" for active living and healthy eating that suggest how specific activities and actions could be pursued are provided. In the tables links are provided to case studies. For example, the Foodlinks “Toolkit” provides model policies, application forms, guidelines and case studies.
d) Allocation of responsibilities and priorities
It is at the Delivery Program/Operational Plan stage that specific responsibilities are allocated for activities, and for monitoring their success. Some local councils include such matters in their Delivery Program in matrix form.
| Strategies | Delivery Program | Operational plan | Responsible Manager | Performance indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
It should also be reiterated that it is not local councils' responsibility to deliver every aspect of their Community Strategic Plan. Some community ambitions are State (or Federal) government responsibilities eg. a new hospital. In such cases local councils could adopt an advocacy and/or a partnership role. Other external partners within the broad community (including volunteer groups) could also be included. The matrix format could be used to identify such actions.
Some larger local councils with extensive Works Programs and Project Schedules hive off the specific detailed listings into separate working documents or “business plans” operating at the ground level. In such cases the Operational Plan (and the Delivery Program) could be summary versions (eg. ‘…as per the Strategic Planner’s Works program’).
The procedures for generating priorities will depend upon individual local councils’ corporate structures and management regimes. Ideally, community-based priorities will result from the community engagement process underpinning the Community Strategic Plan. Final lists of four and one year actions will be the subject of ‘normal’ budgetary negotiations and political priorities.
e) Incorporating current activities and services: flowing up the framework and meeting at the Delivery Program
Local councils consulted during the development of this Guide indicated that specific actions listed in the Delivery Program and prioritised in the Operational Plan often reflect existing (and perhaps long standing) principal activities/services. Initiatives introduced in previous Management Plans, based on previous community engagement processes and consistent with current community views, would continue through into new Delivery Programs.
In other words, as well as cascading down the hierarchy, details also flow up from existing actions and services to meet at the Delivery Program (see Figure 2). In some local councils, the balance may be in favour of existing services and activities (with responsibility to single functional areas/ departments) but, over time, the balance should shift. Case study councils with the benefit of previous strategic planning processes were adamant that the higher order objectives and strategies in the Community Strategic Plan (generated by community engagement) predominate, and that allocation of tasks and coordination across functional areas is achieved (through the Workforce Plan).

Figure 2: Up and down the IPR hierarchy
One large rural council purposely specifies ‘new initiatives’ in their Delivery Program, distinguishing such proposed actions from current or ongoing activities. While such initiatives should be part of the overall Delivery Program, specifically highlighting them is a positive action.
Active living and healthy eating at the operational level: Four-year Delivery Program and One-Year Operational Plan: top down and bottom up
In summary, the following key actions are suggested:
- Elaborate on objectives and broad strategies relating to active living and healthy eating identified in council's Community Strategic Plan
- Consider whether it is appropriate to have a “Community Health and Wellbeing Strategy”, free-standing active living and/ or healthy eating Strategies or to rely on specific activities/ actions in the Delivery Program/Operational Plan
- Acknowledge that, at least in the short term, Delivery Program actions and Operational Plan priorities will reflect some current practices
- Identify obvious existing programs and service areas that cover active living and health eating, eg. recreation/open spaces, community development, farmers’ markets
- Identify existing actions in other program service areas that cover active living and healthy eating eg. streets, cycleway and pathway construction and maintenance, food inspection services
- Incrementally realign programs and actions with the Community Strategic Plan's active living objectives
(f) Key players and drivers
The significance of “drivers”/ champions to work within the local council hierarchy (and externally) is one way to promote objectives and strategies and act as principal contacts. For instance, when local councils’ organisational structure requires action across divisions and in circumstances where council does not favour a freestanding Community Health and Wellbeing Strategy. This could be a dedicated staff person or a Councillor. For example, Kiama’s groundbreaking Health Plan was championed by their previous, long-standing Mayor (and a dedicated staff member).
Key staff players are found in the following functional areas (departmental names will vary between local councils):
- Community Services on active living and healthy eating promotion and programs and connections to relevant community based organisations.
- Parks and Reserves (usually within Engineering/ Technical Services) on open space management (via Plans of Management). Also, volunteers under Bushcare/ Parkcare policies.
- Council Transport Planners/ Engineers, Road Safety Officers and Local Traffic Committees on Integrated Transport Planning and traffic management plans and actions.
- State Agencies on agricultural land and food production/ distribution.
- State Agencies on legal requirements and grant funding.
- Strategic Land-use Planners for managing growth (eg. new release areas) and urban renewal programs.
- Development Assessment Planners for implementing Development Control Plan provisions and development contributions.
As most physical activity (and some food events/ planting) takes place in the public domain, local councils’ Works Division (Engineers) should be targeted for support. In another two roles they are also responsible for traffic planning/ management and local council reserves.
Coordination of staff, ideally through Workforce Plans, would be a Corporate Services responsibility. Specific examples would be:
- Multi-disciplinary teams to deal with particular key issues (or places)
- Regular coordination meetings
- Place Managers, in some local councils, for coordinating day-to-day activities in Centres – educating, briefing, negotiation with key stakeholders (eg. food outlets); arranging public domain events
Last, and certainly not least, are the elected Councillors who ratify the budget and set priority actions. Local elected representatives can introduce actions to works programs and set priorities. Organising briefing sessions for Councillors (and involvement in committees) can also be useful. If these matters are a significant goal, a formal Council Committee could be formed.
In the negotiation of annual priorities, identification and ongoing representations/ contact with relevant key players would assist in promoting discussion and, hopefully, inclusion on one year Operational Plan and four year Delivery Program lists.
(g) Reviewing Delivery Program and Operational Plan priorities: flexibility in the system
The list of priorities in the local council’s Operational Plan (as a sub-set of the four year Delivery Program) should be adjusted in response to changing local and broader circumstances. As a result, promotion of active living and healthy eating initiatives should be ongoing in the negotiation process.
As indicated above, such flexibility takes into account major developments such as changes in the economic climate but, in a positive sense, also enables local councils to respond to opportunities that arise. In relation to active living, this could be the opportunity to purchase strategically located lands (eg. to enhance local pedestrian connections or embellish open space) or to utilise bequests and other financial windfalls.